2561 字
13 分钟
【Nat.Rev.Mater.】新加坡国立刘斌|高性能有机光敏剂分子设计的3大机制与机器学习自驱动发现前沿综述

【Nat.Rev.Mater.】新加坡国立刘斌|高性能有机光敏剂分子设计的3大机制与机器学习自驱动发现前沿综述#

文章标题:Molecular design for high-performance organic photosensitizers

通讯作者:Bin Liu (刘斌)

文章链接:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-026-00930-6

文章概要#

引言#

有机光敏剂作为一类能够吸收光能并将其转化为化学或生物效应的独特分子,在生物医药中的光动力治疗、能源转化、环境治理以及光催化合成等众多前沿领域中发挥着举足轻重的作用。其核心价值在于其高度可调的分子结构以及多样的激发态动力学行为,使得科学家能够针对特定环境精确调节其光物理和 photochemical 过程。然而,由于缺乏对分子结构与光物理性质之间复杂关系的深刻理解,传统的光敏剂开发长期依赖于繁琐的经验性筛选,这在很大程度上限制了高性能光敏剂的理性设计与突破。为了系统性解决这一痛点,将先进的机器学习技术引入光敏剂的预测性工作流,正在推动该领域从经验筛选向数据驱动的智能设计发生深刻的范式转变。 |1000

Fig. 1: Overview of the photosensitization mechanisms and the integration of machine learning to accelerate photosensitizer discovery.#
The main photosensitization pathways are classified into three different groups: energy-transfer-based type II photosensitizers (PSs, top panel), electron-transfer-based type I PSs (left panel) and oxygen-independent PSs through direct substrate activation (right panel). Bottom panel: schematic machine-learning (ML) workflow for PS discovery. ISC, intersystem crossing; PS*, excited-state PS; S0, singlet ground state; S1, lowest singlet excited state; T1, lowest triplet excited state.#

研究梳理与综述核心#

在这篇系统性的综述中,作者首先梳理了有机光敏剂的核心光敏化机制,并将其归纳为三大主要路径。第一类是依赖氧气的II型机制,光敏剂通过能量转移将周围的基态氧转化为具有强氧化性的单线态氧。提升II型光敏化效率的关键在于优化系统间窜跃(ISC)效率,通过调控分子轨道的空间分离以降低单线态与三线态的能量差。重原子效应如碘取代,或硫代羰基取代等无重原子策略,以及引入扭曲分子构型和分子自组装工程,都是增强自旋轨道耦合、促进三线态捕获的有效分子设计手段。针对传统光敏剂在聚集态下极易发生发光剧烈猝灭的难题,聚集诱合发光(AIE)光敏剂通过分子内运动受限机制,在聚集态下仍能高效产生单线态氧,并通过供体-受体(D-A)微调、共轭桥延伸及 polymerization 反应,实现了多通道系统间窜跃的协同放大。此外,通过构建多生色团的能量转移体系,还能够实施吸收调制,显著增强其摩尔吸光系数并拓宽激发窗口。

|1000

Fig. 2: Representative structures and design strategies of type II photosensitizers.#
a, Typical molecular structures of type II photosensitizers (PSs). b, Schematic illustration of highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO)–lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) engineering for fine-tuned Δ_E_ST (singlet–triplet energy gap). c, Emerging strategies for facilitating the intersystem crossing (ISC) process: schematic illustration of ISC engineering via enhancing spin–orbit coupling (SOC) or reducing Δ_E_ST; heteroatom substitution; twisted molecular conformations; and aggregation-enhanced ISC through self-assembly of chromophores. d, Molecular engineering of aggregation-induced emission (AIE) PSs through D–A engineering, π-bridge extension and polymerization. e, Absorption modulation through the Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) mechanism. A, acceptor; D, donor; S0, singlet ground state; S1, lowest singlet excited state; T1, lowest triplet excited state; TPE, tetraphenylethylene.#

第二类是对氧气依赖性较低的I型机制,它通过激发态光敏剂与周围底物发生一系列电子转移,生成超氧阴离子自由基、羟基自由基和过氧化氢。由于I型机制需要激发态能量有效竞争过能量转移路径,其设计难度通常更高。目前主要的构筑策略包括能量转移阻断,即通过合理控制光敏剂的三线态能级,使其低于敏化氧气产生单线态氧的阈值,从而选择性地触发I型光路。同时,利用外围结构修饰进行电子转移编程,引入强吸电子或供电子基团作为“电子泵”或“电子水库”,能有效重塑激发态的电子流向。此外,通过聚集态下的同质分子自组装诱导对称性破缺电荷分离,或者在单分子内共价连接特异性电子供受体构建光诱导电荷分离体系,能够稳定生成自由基离子对,从而极大地加速I型活性氧物种的释放。

|1000

Fig. 3: Representative structures and design strategies of type I photosensitizers.#
a, Typical structures of type I photosensitizers (PSs). b, Energy-transfer blocking strategy, in which synergistic intersystem crossing (ISC) enhancement and suppression of the energy-transfer pathway selectively facilitate type I reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. c, Electron-transfer programming strategy, in which covalent incorporation of electron-donating or electron-withdrawing units directs excited-state electron flow towards type I ROS generation. d, Photoinduced charge separation strategy, in which intermolecular (top panel) or intramolecular (bottom panel) electron transfer generates radical pairs that drive type I ROS formation. D–A, donor–acceptor; ES, excited state; ET, electron transfer; GS, ground state; 1PS*, singlet excited state; 3PS*, triplet excited state; PS•−, photosensitizer anion radical; PS•+, photosensitizer cation radical; SOC, spin–orbit coupling; S0, ground state; S1, lowest singlet excited state; T1, lowest triplet excited state; Δ_E_ST, singlet–triplet energy gap.#

第三类则是新兴的无氧激发机制,这类光敏剂能够在严重缺氧的环境中直接激活周围的底物,完美绕过了对外界分子氧的依赖,为解决生物体内肿瘤缺氧耐受性等极端环境应用提供了创新的分子解法。无氧光敏剂可细分为氧自给型氧旁路型两种设计思路。氧自给型光敏剂主要通过模拟水氧化机制,利用光生空穴的强氧化电位将水直接氧化为氧气和氢离子,生成的氧气随即作为中间体在微环境中参与后续的活性氧转化,从而实现缺氧环境下的自循环光催化。氧旁路型光敏剂则通过精准的轨道能量匹配与空间紧密结合,将激发态的能量、电子或空穴直接输送给目标生物大分子或底物,引发特定化学键断裂或还原反应,实现高选择性的直接底物激活。此外,分子设计还可以扩展到多组分复合物体系,通过引入外部电子供体如血清白蛋白或电子受体如百里醌,动态调节电子和能量的分配格局,从而在不同活性氧路径之间实现智能的可控转换。

|1000

Fig. 4: Design strategies for oxygen-independent photosensitizers.#
Typical thermodynamic (panel a) and kinetic (panel b) characteristics and reaction mechanisms of oxygen-independent photosensitizers (PSs), encompassing both oxygen self-sufficient and oxygen-bypassed PSs. Thermodynamic and kinetic design strategies of oxygen self-sufficient (panel c) and oxygen-bypassed (panel d) PSs. PS*, excited-state photosensitizer; RedPS, reduction potential of PS; RedSubstrates, reduction potential of substrates; S1, lowest singlet excited state; T1, lowest triplet excited state.#

|1000

Fig. 5: Modulation of photosensitization pathways.#
a–d, Schematic illustration of electron-transfer-based photosensitization pathway modulation, including electron donor-mediated photoinduced electron transfer (PET, panel a) and electron acceptor-mediated PET (panel c). Representative structures of electron donors (panel b) and electron acceptors (panel d) are presented. e,f, Schematic illustration of energy-transfer-based photosensitization modulation through FRET (panel e) and triplet–triplet energy transfer (panel f). A, acceptor; D, donor; ISC, intersystem crossing; PS, photosensitizer; TA, tertiary amine; TIPS, triisopropylsilyl.#

为了彻底攻克光敏剂结构-性能关系难以捉摸的难关,机器学习(ML)正在成为加速新型分子发现的关键底座。在监督学习框架下,研究者利用分子指纹、前线轨道能量以及量子化学描述符,成功构建了能够高效预测氟硼荧(BODIPY)、卟啉和花菁等主流光敏剂家族量子产率与生物活性的分类与回归模型,并在百万级的大规模分子库中筛选出了性能优异的候选分子。进一步地,主动学习将图卷积网络代理模型与密度泛函理论计算紧密耦合,形成闭环反馈体系,通过贝叶斯优化在庞大的分子空间中迭代选择最具信息量的数据进行再训练,极大地提高了高性能分子的命中率。在此基础上,深度生成模型引入强化学习算法,能够从断裂的化学片段或SMILES字符串中从头构筑满足吸收波长与能量激发双重约束的全新分子骨架,彻底打破了传统合成库的边界限制。

|1000

Fig. 6: Machine learning for photosensitizer design.#
a, Supervised learning models use molecular representations with statistical or deep-learning algorithms. b, Active learning integrates machine learning (ML) models with density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) calculations in a feedback loop, in which Bayesian optimization suggests new candidates for evaluation and retraining. c, Generative pipelines apply ML models with reinforcement learning to propose novel scaffolds. d, Representative and experimentally validated molecular structures obtained from different ML approaches. PS, photosensitizer.#

总结与未来展望#

综上所述,虽然有机光敏剂的理性设计与机器学习辅助发现已经取得了显著的进展,但迈向更智能的工业和临床应用仍面临诸多关键瓶颈。首先是在实验评估层面,目前整个领域仍极度缺乏针对超氧阴离子和羟基自由基等I型活性氧产率的标准化、定量化检测协议,导致不同研究之间的实验数据难以直接横向对比,这也极大限制了机器学习训练集的数据质量。其次,真实的生物或催化环境非常复杂,光敏剂往往同时处于多种竞争机制的混合状态,如何在分子标签中进行多路径的多维上下文标注,是构建高泛化性模型的核心挑战。最后,未来的机器学习模型必须摆脱传统的2D分子拓扑限制,全面拥抱能够捕获构型柔性与刚性的3D物理空间描述符,并深入融合溶剂效应、酸碱度及蛋白质相互作用等复杂的环境效应。通过将多目标帕累托优化算法与自动化多功能“自驱动实验室”闭环平台相结合,未来有望实现光敏剂从按需合成、原位表征到场景化应用驱动的完全自主智能化流水线开发。

【Nat.Rev.Mater.】新加坡国立刘斌|高性能有机光敏剂分子设计的3大机制与机器学习自驱动发现前沿综述
https://fuwari.vercel.app/posts/fluorapid/2026/07-06月/26-06051/
作者
Fluolab
发布于
2026-06-01
许可协议
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0